Long title, odd painting

The title of this painting is 160804 Seated Woman Wearing a Cashmere Sweater, Maxi Tube Skirt and Clogs, With Rifle, Feeding Ducks. It’s a pretty thorough description of the picture and it makes me laugh. It also reminds me of the titles that Jim Shaw gave his Thrift Store Paintings.


160804a Seated Woman Wearing a Cashmere Sweater, Maxi Tube Skirt and Clogs, with Rifle, Feeding Ducks (2016) oil on canvas

I think it’s kind of an ugly mess. Part of me thinks I should scrape it off and re-use the canvas. This is the first time I’ve painted onto a stretched canvas, and I made the stretcher myself so I know it’s a lot of work to make another one. It’s also too big to store easily. I can see the sense in re-using the canvas, but… I’m not in the habit of destroying anything I’ve painted so far, and I like living with my “mistakes”. The more “wrong” they look to me, the more I want to understand their “wrong”ness.

When I think something that I paint looks “right”, that usually means it reminds me of another painter’s work, and that’s not necessarily a good thing. I don’t want to develop a style that’s obviously similar to my favourite artists. That would be boring for the viewer, and for me. So when I paint something that looks “wrong”, I try to see what exactly makes it “wrong” and whether that “wrong”ness might be useful in some circumstances.

Having said all that, today’s painting might look “wrong” to me, but that doesn’t make it wildly original. I see echoes of plenty of other artists.

The untidy wet-on-wet brush work reminds me of some Neo-Expressionism, I’m not sure which painter exactly, maybe Baselitz?


Georg Baselitz Hundejunge (1966) oil on herringbone cloth 179.7 x 140.34cm

Another artist I thought of is Gauguin, although there isn’t a huge similarity and he’s not someone I often think about. Perhaps he came to mind because of Vision after the Sermon, which, like my painting, features wonky drawing, cropped figures, and an orange-red ground that fills the frame.


Paul Gauguin Vision after the Sermon (Jacob Wrestling with the Angel) (1888) oil on canvas 72.2 x 91cm

More obviously, the oats that my lady is throwing to the ducks are definitely some bastardised van Gogh brush strokes.


160804 Seated Woman Wearing a Cashmere Sweater, Maxi Tube Skirt and Clogs, With Rifle, Feeding Ducks [detail] (2016) oil on canvas 44 x 44cm


Vincent van Gogh Landscape with Wheat Sheaves and Rising Moon (1889) oil on canvas

There are also a couple of derivations that I was conscious of when I was painting. (A), The duck has a yellow outline because I saw yellow outlines at the Alex Katz exhibition at Serpentine gallery. Katz often uses them in his portraits, especially this one.

Eli's Friend 1985 by Alex Katz born 1927

Alex Katz Eli’s Friend (1985) oil paint on hardboard 40.2 x 30cm

And (B), my lady’s strangely drawn legs began as a shapeless doodled blob, but the blob reminded me of the legs in John Currin’s Stamford After Brunch, which gave me the idea to turn the blob into legs in my painting too. (Why is derivation so hard to resist?)


John Currin Stamford After Brunch (2000) oil on canvas (anyone know the dimensions? Let me know)

I didn’t set out to paint a seated woman feeding ducks. I planned to paint the canvas all-over one colour as a background and let it dry before improvising something over it next week – abstract or figurative, I didn’t have anything in mind. When I started painting this background I tried to modulate the colour a little, but that became a whole variety of shapes. The so-called “background” can be seen below, on the left. When I looked at it this morning the shapes suggested an image to me, of this seated woman feeding ducks, so I just painted in the remaining details. Now that I look at the two side by side, I wish that I’d been more sparing in what I painted on top.

By adding so much detail, I lost a lot of what I liked about the original painting. In future if I try the same process, I’ll only paint in the details that are absolutely necessary to suggest the figuration I have in mind. As a process for making pictures, I like this method. It’s a development from the unintentional figuration stuff I wrote about here.


3 thoughts on “Long title, odd painting

  1. Sam Paine. I initially contacted you for proper reasons. But of course, there’s always an agenda. You hot, etc., me being a gay man.

    Forget all that. I’ve already told you I am grateful and enliven by your narrative content. This one is outstanding. Not many people achieve useful objectivity in their self analysis.

    Thanks. Legit hahaha


  2. Pingback: More small doodles | dailydaub

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s