Climate change, cognitive dissonance and ideology

On May 12th 2016, Noam Chomsky gave a lecture at Harvard-Epworth Church, Cambridge, MA. He took a question from the audience, about:

“the cognitive dissonance that many of my generation feel surrounding what we’re told about climate change versus how we’re told to live our lives, in the sense that we’re still encouraged to have children, we’re still encouraged to continue consuming in unsustainable ways, pursue careers, in spite of the fact that we’re also taught in the same institutions that are encouraging us to go on, have careers, live our lives, at the same time that catastrophic climate change is almost inevitable. So, I guess my question is, do you have any advice in terms of dealing with that intense cognitive dissonance and not be paralysed by the sense that there’s nothing we can do, and our generation is essentially doomed to inherit an intractable problem.”

The question begins at 53:12.

I have the same sense of cognitive dissonance in regard to my own decision to dedicate time and energy to painting. Currently, my painting does nothing to respond to the problem of climate change, except to ignore it. My paintings don’t contribute to averting climate change (as a collective effort), nor (to be more cynical) does my painting prepare me personally for a world affected by climate change (by, for example, earning me money). Every time I hear about another flood or drought, I think, “I can’t ignore this any longer”, and yet I continue to paint.

Zizek describes this in a lecture that was uploaded to YouTube on Dec 19th 2014, saying:

“… this gap between what we rationally know and what we unconsciously believe tells us, I claim, a lot about our predicament: namely, how we relate usually to the prospect of ecological catastrophe. It’s a paradox. Basically, we know catastrophe is coming, there will be global warming, whatever, but why don’t we act? Why don’t we do something? I don’t think it’s enough, this simple Left-ist explanation: manipulation, big companies, whatever. I claim: We know, but we don’t believe.”

Zizek goes on to say more. This part of the lecture begins at 54.08

So, why am I painting? Should I be painting differently, or doing something else altogether? I don’t have answers to these questions, and strangely I currently seem to be immune to absorbing the ways that Chomsky and Zizek answer these questions. However, I also don’t expect the issue to go away. In fact, if the science is correct, then it will become more pressing every day, for all of us, and art will be impacted whether it responds actively or passively.

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Climate change, cognitive dissonance and ideology

  1. the question of your purpose and, maybe, your obligations, in the light of climate change are ones which could be raised in the light of any looming catastrophe in any age by any artist. That does not make your questions irrrelevant. It places you in that field of thinkers who wrestle with these questions eternally. Your diary entries suggest that you are bent on forging your skills into greater competencies and potentials. If all the creative beings amongst us pursue excellence and understanding in the knowledge that, as they do so, our home is being destroyed, just maybe this will be not only as much as they can do, but it might actually tip the scales for good at the end of the day. Deciding not to down tools in the face of disaster will in itself be a political act and, at some point, might require considerable intent. Your questions are thrown up into the air and you give no indication of your ultimate thinking. That is as it should be. It is enough that you pose the questions and it is more than gratifying for anyone following you to share in such musings.

    I was going to say that you are deeply impacting the climate of my interacting with your writings, but that sounded a bit twee.

    Like

    • Thanks for that comment. One thing I love about your comments is that they’re so interesting and encouraging, and I feel the best response to them is not to come up with an intelligent reply (which I don’t have) but to continue to paint. Thanks again.

      Like

  2. Pingback: Painting in crisis times | dailydaub

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s